|
CHARACTERISTICS OF EDITORIAL WRITING
An editorial is an article that presents the newspaper's opinion on
an issue. It reflects the majority vote of the editorial board, the
governing body of the newspaper made up of editors and business
managers. It is usually unsigned. Much in the same manner of a
lawyer, editorial writers build on an argument and try to persuade
readers to think the same way they do. Editorials are meant to
influence public opinion, promote critical thinking, and sometimes
cause people to take action on an issue. In essence, an editorial is
an opinionated news story.
Editorials have:
1. Introduction, body and conclusion like other news stories
2. An objective explanation of the issue, especially complex issues
3. A timely news angle
4. Opinions from the opposing viewpoint that refute directly the
same issues the writer addresses
5. The opinions of the writer delivered in a professional manner.
Good editorials engage issues, not personalities and refrain from
name-calling or other petty tactics of persuasion.
6. Alternative solutions to the problem or issue being criticized.
Anyone can gripe about a problem, but a good editorial should take a
pro-active approach to making the situation better by using
constructive criticism and giving solutions.
7. A solid and concise conclusion that powerfully summarizes the
writer's opinion. Give it some punch.
Four Types of Editorials Will:
1. Explain or interpret: Editors often use these editorials
to explain the way the newspaper covered a sensitive or
controversial subject. School newspapers may explain new school
rules or a particular student-body effort like a food drive.
2. Criticize: These editorials constructively criticize
actions, decisions or situations while providing solutions to the
problem identified. Immediate purpose is to get readers to see the
problem, not the solution.
3. Persuade: Editorials of persuasion aim to immediately
see the solution, not the problem. From the first paragraph, readers
will be encouraged to take a specific, positive action. Political
endorsements are good examples of editorials of persuasion.
4. Praise: These editorials commend people and
organizations for something done well. They are not as common as the
other three.
Writing an Editorial
1. Pick a significant topic that has a current news angle and would
interest readers.
2. Collect information and facts; include objective reporting; do
research
3. State your opinion briefly in the fashion of a thesis statement
4. Explain the issue objectively as a reporter would and tell why
this situation is important
5. Give opposing viewpoint first with its quotations and facts
6. Refute (reject) the other side and develop your case using facts,
details, figures, quotations. Pick apart the other side's logic.
7. Concede a point of the opposition — they must have some good
points you can acknowledge that would make you look rational.
8. Repeat key phrases to reinforce an idea into the reader's minds.
9. Give a realistic solution(s) to the problem that goes beyond
common knowledge. Encourage critical thinking and pro-active
reaction.
10. Wrap it up in a concluding punch that restates your opening
remark (thesis statement).
11. Keep it to 500 words; make every work count; never use "I"
A Sample Structure
I. Lead with an Objective Explanation of the Issue/Controversy.
Include the five W's and the H. (Members of Congress, in effort to
reduce the budget, are looking to cut funding from public
television. Hearings were held …)
Pull in facts and quotations from the sources which are relevant.
Additional research may be necessary.
II. Present Your Opposition First.
As the writer you disagree with these viewpoints. Identify the
people (specifically who oppose you. (Republicans feel that these
cuts are necessary; other cable stations can pick them; only the
rich watch public television.)
Use facts and quotations to state objectively their opinions.
Give a strong position of the opposition. You gain nothing in
refuting a weak position.
III. Directly Refute The Opposition's Beliefs.
You can begin your article with transition. (Republicans believe
public televison is a "sandbox for the rich." However, statistics
show most people who watch public television make less than $40,000
per year.)
Pull in other facts and quotations from people who support your
position.
Concede a valid point of the opposition which will make you appear
rational, one who has considered all the options (fiscal times are
tough, and we can cut some of the funding for the arts; however, …).
IV. Give Other, Original Reasons/Analogies
In defense of your position, give reasons from strong to strongest
order. (Taking money away from public television is robbing children
of their education …)
Use a literary or cultural allusion that lends to your credibility
and perceived intelligence (We should render unto Caesar that which
belongs to him …)
V. Conclude With Some Punch.
Give solutions to the problem or challenge the reader to be
informed. (Congress should look to where real wastes exist — perhaps
in defense and entitlements — to find ways to save money. Digging
into public television's pocket hurts us all.)
A quotation can be effective, especially if from a respected source
A rhetorical question can be an effective concluder as well (If the
government doesn't defend the interests of children, who will?)
|